Lending

A Closer Look at Payday Loans

Never underestimate the tenacity of a consumer who wants something.

November 22, 2013
KEYWORDS financial , lending , payday
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Yes, they’re horrible, but research shows they can meet a need.

The other day I found out that a close family member—whose name I will not disclose, and refer to only as “my daughter”—took out a payday loan with a local credit union.

I told her, in a clear and professional manner, this was a poor financial decision, which made her storm off in a huff. I believe the phrase I used was, “as dumb as inviting Miley Cyrus to your dance recital.” This, in hindsight, might not have been received in the spirit I intended.

After things calmed down, I realized my biggest surprise was that a credit union would be offering payday loans. After all, we all know that payday lending is a practice best left to those void of morals, ethics, or civility.

Or is it?

My daughter actually had a legitimate borrowing need. She needed to get her moped fixed because it’s her only source of transportation. Temporarily out of work due to a school break, she borrowed $200 and paid it back within 10 days.

According to my calculator, the annual percentage rate (APR) on the loan was about 438%. A loan officer might say this is “a tad above what we can get for an indirect auto loan.”

Other options presented much better rates, but she knew the loan would be granted quickly and with little hassle. “Why would I take the chance of being denied?” she asked. In her mind, the APR wasn’t the most important consideration. She recognized a problem, figured out a solution, and executed the process. As she zipped off on her moped, I found it difficult to argue with the results.

So, is payday lending the evil most of us say it is?

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published a report earlier this year, Payday Loans and Deposit Advance Products . In general terms, the CFPB concluded two types of consumers use payday lenders— the casual borrower and the perpetual borrower.

Opponents of payday lending focus primarily on perpetual borrowers—those who find themselves locked in a continuous debt cycle. Payday lending opponents offer emotionally and economically persuasive arguments when they focus on perpetual borrowers.

Consider, though, the ramifications of an outright ban. Some say this will stop the abuse and ultimately make consumers financially smarter. But as author and journalist George Leef wrote for the Foundation for Economic Education, “You can’t make people better off by taking options away from them.”

A Federal Reserve Bank of New York research paper analyzed the effects of a payday lending ban in North Carolina and Georgia. The researchers concluded consumers were actually in worse financial shape after the ban due to higher bankruptcy rates, more bounced checks, and more

The research paper offers two lessons:

What about these free-market options? Let’s say a consumer pays his $100 cell phone bill when he’s a little short of funds, and his check bounces. The combination of nonsufficient funds and merchant fees could result in an APR exceeding 1,000%, which leaves that ugly, despicable payday loan the deal of the day.

Meanwhile, back at the Collins household, I took my daughter aside and made this request: “The next time you get yourself in a pickle, ask me first. My rates are much lower.”

She thought for a moment before responding: “Dad, it’s not your rate; it’s your terms and conditions.”

 

 

 

 

 

JAMES COLLINS is president/CEO at O Bee CU, Tumwater, Wash.

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive