Don’t Expect ‘Dramatic’ Payments Change Soon

But CUs should investigate these strategies while on watch for a truly disruptive system.

October 11, 2013
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Not even a fortune teller can forecast exactly which revolutionary new payment model might supplant good ol’ 1960s era card swipe technology, but George Hofheimer says the crystal ball will deliver the answer in a riddle:

What system’s more fast, accurate, and secure, most likely adheres to the existing “payment plumbing” of liability custody, and passes muster with the five transaction touch points: consumers, merchants, issuers, acquirers, and card associations?

Clearly, the barrier to acceptance is steep, George Hofheimer—chief researcher and innovator at Filene Research Institute—told CUNA Community Credit Union & Growth Conference attendees at a breakout session on the future of payments.

“In the short term, we’re probably not going anywhere dramatically different anytime soon,” Hofheimer said.

Consider the hand-wringing over the 2015 liability deadlines for conversion to EuroPay, MasterCard, and Visa (EMV) chip technology. EMV doesn’t even fundamentally upset the apple cart of swipe technology, which remains “absolutely dominant,” and its debit and interchange fees upon which many credit unions rely.

Essentially, the new payment models “haven’t taken hold because the technology we have today is good enough,” Hofheimer summarized. “Consumers like it, and merchants for the most part like it, despite the fees.”

That said, Hofheimer subscribes to Bill Gates’ philosophy on futurism. In the Microsoft founder’s words: “We always overestimate the change that will occur in the next two years and underestimate the change that will occur in the next 10.”

Credit unions closely monitor developments in the payment sector but generally concede that because they pale in size to megabanks they’re better positioned as fast followers than first adopters, according to Hofheimer. Two-thirds say they’ll actively consider new payment providers in the next 24 months.

Investigate what systems megabanks use, since they’re industry leaders, says Hofheimer, and don’t base your decision on consumer polls.

“Consumers are extremely fickle,” Hofheimer said. “When you look at consumer data on how they want to pay in the future, what they say and do are two very different things. And generally, the answer to which system they prefer is, ‘I really don’t care. I just want to buy stuff.’”

Hofheimer suggested a few strategies for credit unions:

Capitalize on physical assets. Consumers aren’t comfortable with managing their financial lives in the way they’re comfortable bypassing other old standbys like the record store or bookstore. They always need a safety valve, and that’s credit unions.

Leverage payments data. Take stock of the information you have in hand, make sense of it, and use it to deepen relationships with customers and merchants.

Focus on commerce. Go beyond payments and attempt to develop partnerships in your community. Explain to the local gas station owner (using data you’ve mined from your credit union) that your members spend $3 million a year there, and ask to forge a relationship.

Experiment with small bets. Invest in a start-up or fledgling payments technology firm with an amount of money that won’t break you.

Collaborate with credit unions and vendors. This could be a coalescing moment for credit unions. They might be too small to solve the situation individually but could band together to find a solution – similar to how banks forged together on Visa to advance past the cash-and-check era. “In the worst case scenario—if interchange went away—wouldn’t you wish collaboration would’ve happened 10 years earlier?” Hofheimer asked.

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive