Compliance Q&A: Indirect Lending

Who's responsible for providing the risk-based pricing notice?

August 09, 2013
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Q: Who is responsible for providing the risk-based pricing notice in an indirect lending arrangement: the auto dealer or the credit union?

A: The original creditor is responsible for providing the risk-based pricing notice. The original creditor is the person to whom the obligation is initially payable.

In some cases, the auto dealer is the original creditor that extends credit contingent on the ability to assign the loan to a third-party. If this is the case, the auto dealer must provide the riskbased pricing notice.

If the credit union is the original creditor, it will be obligated to either provide the notice or contract with the auto dealer to provide it. If this is the case, the credit union must have policies and procedures in place to ensure the dealer provides the notice in a timely manner.

Q: Can credit unions inform members if their funds have been blocked in accordance with Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) regulations?

A: Yes. The credit union may notify a member that it has blocked (i.e., frozen) funds in accordance with OFAC’s instructions.

The member has the right to apply for the unblocking and release of the funds through OFAC’s licensing procedures. The procedures and application form for unblocking funds are available at (select “resource center” and then “financial sanctions”).

Visit CUNA’s compliance blog— “CompBlog”—at Email with questions or ideas, and keep the conversation going with your peers on COBWEB—CUNA’s compliance listserv. 

Read more compliance Q&As

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive