Regulatory Compliance for Investments

NCUA’s investment regulations will address ‘standards of creditworthiness.’

July 31, 2013
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

The Dodd-Frank Act requires the federal banking agencies and NCUA to remove all references to credit ratings in their regulations and substitute “other standards of creditworthiness” the agencies deem appropriate.

NCUA finalized amendments to its investment regulation (Section 703) last December, and the changes are effective June 11, 2013. NCUA believes about 750 federal credit unions must develop or augment their systems to evaluate the creditworthiness of their investments.

CUNA expects NCUA to issue (near press time) additional guidance on how to comply with its new investment rules. The agency says it will provide more information about ways credit unions can evaluate a possible investment and what examiners will expect.

As a refresher, NCUA’s investment regulation is already quite comprehensive in its requirements. It addresses required investment policies, recordkeeping and documentation requirements, control over investments and advisers, credit analysis, noncompliant investments, broker-dealers’ qualifications, safekeeping, valuing securities, monitoring securities and nonsecurity investments, permissible and prohibited investments, grandfathered investments, conflicts of interest, and investment pilot programs. The new rules address aspects of the existing regulations that rely on references to credit ratings.

Which CUs must follow the rules

Section 703 applies only to investments by federal credit unions. But if a federally insured state-chartered credit union (FISCU) holds an investment that isn’t permissible for a federal credit union, it might be subject to special reserving on that investment.

During the comment period on the proposed regulation, someone wrote that if a FISCU holds a ratings-based investment that’s permissible under state law that tracks the old regulation, then NCUA shouldn’t consider that investment “nonconforming” and subject to special reserves.

NCUA answered by including this amendment to Section 741 that’s applicable to state-chartered credit unions:

“[I]f a state-chartered credit union conducts and documents an analysis that reasonably concludes an investment is at least investment grade, as defined in Section 703.2 of this chapter, and the investment is otherwise permissible for federal credit unions, that investment is not considered to be beyond those authorized by the Act of the NCUA Rules and Regulations.”

So state-chartered credit unions also should review the new investment rules applicable to federal credit unions to determine what changes they might need to make in their investment programs.

The new 'investment grade' standard

If NCUA must eliminate all references to credit ratings—such as “AAA” or “AA”—and credit rating agencies in its regulations to define permissible investments, what does it consider “an appropriate standard”?

Section 703.2 says:

“Investment grade means the issuer of a security has an adequate capacity to meet the financial commitments under the security for the projected life of the asset or exposure, even under adverse economic conditions. An issuer has an adequate capacity to meet financial commitments if the risk of default by the obligor is low and the full and timely repayment of principal and interest on the security is expected.”

The regulation lists eight factors a credit union can use to evaluate the creditworthiness of a security; a credit union might consider any of them as appropriate. The supplemental information that accompanies the final regulation issued last December elaborates a little on what these eight factors mean, and NCUA is expected to provide more details in its coming guidance.

These are the factors a credit union might consider (and the list isn’t intended to be exhaustive):

► Credit spreads;

► Securities-related research;

► Internal or external credit risk assessments;

► Default statistics;

► Inclusion on an index;

► Priorities and enhancements;

► Price, yield, and/or volume; and

► Asset class-specific factors.

Keep in mind that although NCUA can’t reference credit ratings in its regulation, nothing prohibits credit unions from using credit ratings as an element of the required credit analysis under the agency’s new regulation, which explains the third factor.

NEXT: Board of directors involvement

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive