CU Data

Public National Debt Exceeds Bank Deposits

National public debt now totals $11.6 trillion, compared to the $10.6 trillion in U.S. bank deposits.

February 03, 2013
KEYWORDS debt , federal , government , public
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

The total amount of public debt, a portion of the total national debt, now exceeds public money deposited in U.S. banks: $11.6 trillion vs. $10.6 trillion, according to Market Rates Insight.

Historically, the amount of consumers deposits held by banks was greater than the amount of public debt (data available from 1997). In December 2010, both bank deposits and public debt stood at about $9.4 trillion each.

Since then, the amount of public debt has increased 23%, compared to 13% growth among bank deposits.

The total federal debt, also known as gross debt, currently stands at $16.4 trillion. This is the amount of the federal government’s outstanding debt issued by the Treasury Department and other federal government agencies.

The gross debt consists of two components: Debt held by the public, which includes debt held by all investors outside of the federal government, and debt held by government accounts, primarily to federal trust funds such as Social Security and Medicare.

Whenever a government account must spend more than it takes in from the public, the Treasury must provide cash to redeem debt held by the government accounts such as the Social Security and Medicare trust funds.

“If there is another good reason for the upcoming debate on the national debt,” says Market Rates Insight Executive Vice President Dan Geller, Ph.D., “it is the fact that all the public’s bank savings is not enough to cover the public portion of the national debt.”

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive