Measure Lending Success with Risk-Rating

Shrinking margins heightens importance of credit quality.

January 02, 2013
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

How do you measure the success of your loan portfolio? For most credit unions, success is measured in growth.

But with ever-shrinking margins, the measurement of your portfolio should include an assessment of loan quality based on the current credit quality and interest rates earned.

For lenders that risk-rate their loan portfolios, there is a quick approach to measuring the loan portfolio’s credit quality. This is done by reapplying the current loan policy guidelines to all of the loans in the portfolio.

This analysis should include a rescoring of the credit scores and measurement of the loan to value on collateralized loans. Then, based on the results of the credit scores and the current loan to values, you can reapply the interest rates you would have used if the loans were underwritten today.

Once you have established the current rate that is earned and the rate that would have been earned, you can perform a net present valuation of both portfolios using the stated maturity. If your portfolio is trending as higher-risk, you will get a lower net present value on the reassessed portfolio.

Lenders that don’t risk-rate their portfolios may need to perform more a comprehensive evaluation of the loan portfolio. This can be performed using a multi-dimensional analysis that will help you identify specific, embedded losses in the portfolio at the loan level.

There are several providers in the market that can assist you with a software platform, providing a “do-it-yourself” approach. Or you can use a full-service provider that will help you measure and understand the process of evaluating risks and losses.

In either case, what you are looking to understand is the embedded losses at the loan level within your loan portfolio and the direction of risks over the term of the portfolio’s life.

Once you have identified the higher-risk loans within the portfolio you will need to calculate your anticipated loss at the loan level based on the current value of any collateral. This anticipated loss then becomes your discount to the portfolio’s projected earnings using each loan’s stated interest rate.

Using this approach you measure your anticipated earning over the life of the loan, less your expected losses, to calculate your net interest return.

In all cases, there is no perfect approach to evaluating the success of the loan portfolio. But with the advances in technology over the last few years, this process has become much more efficient and easier to perform because we are not limited to sampling or ratios to evaluate success.

For the first time we can consider every loan in the portfolio and measure the risks and success of our lending strategies based on specific criteria. This ultimately helps your members manage their debt—and protects your capital and bottom line.





STEVE MILLER is director of operations for Twenty Twenty Analytics, a CUNA Strategic Services alliance provider.

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive