Remittance Transfers: What Has Changed Since February?

CFPB now exempts institutions that transmit 100 or fewer transfers per year.

September 20, 2012
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

When the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released its remittance transfer (i.e., international money transfer) final rule in February, the agency also published a notice of proposed rulemaking seeking comment on whether to provide a safe harbor to exempt institutions from the rule if they transmitted 25 or fewer remittance transfers per year.

The comment period closed April 9, 2012, and the CFPB issued the supplemental final Aug. 7, increasing the proposed 25 transfers to 100 transfers per year. The regulation goes into effect Feb. 7, 2013.

Safe Harbor

The CFPB’s final rule provides a new safe harbor clarifying when a person provides remittance transfers in the “normal course of business” for purposes of determining whether a “person” falls under the definition of “remittance transfer provider.”

Remember, the definition of a remittance transfer provider is a person who provides remittance transfers in the normal course of business. And, under Regulation E, a person means a natural person or an organization, including a corporation, partnership, cooperative, association, and so on.

The final rule states that if an institution:

Also note that the proposed safe harbor was located in the staff commentary to the rule. The final safe harbor is included in regulatory text, with further guidance in the commentary.

More modifications

The August final rule also modifies several aspects of the February final rule regarding remittance transfers that are scheduled before the date of transfer, including preauthorized remittance transfers:

If estimates are provided under this exception, the provider generally must give the sender an additional receipt with accurate figures after the transfer is made.

However, the final rule generally requires a remittance transfer provider to provide accurate receipts after subsequent transfers are made.

The August final rule also modifies the disclosure requirements for remittance transfers scheduled at least three business days before the date of transfer and for preauthorized remittance transfers.

The final rule generally requires disclosure of the date of transfer on the initial receipt and on any subsequent receipts provided with respect to a particular transfer.

For subsequent preauthorized remittance transfers, the final rule also requires the remittance transfer provider to disclose the future date or dates the remittance transfer provider will execute subsequent transfers in the series.

The final rule permits providers to describe on a receipt both the three-business-day and 30-minute cancellation periods, and either describe the transfers to which each deadline applies or, alternatively, use a checkbox or other method to designate which cancellation period is applicable to the transfer.

The final rule does not change the three-business-day cancellation period for these transfers.

Please stay tuned—more information will be forthcoming in CUNA’s CompBlog and in CUNA’s e-Guide to Federal Laws and Regulations, where we’ll be creating a separate section to house information on remittance transfer requirements.

VALERIE MOSS is CUNA’s director of compliance information.


Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive