Products

Fynanz Surpasses 200 Lending Partners

Thirty new lending partners have joined the private student lending platform in early 2012.

June 05, 2012
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Fynanz Inc. has added Sunmark Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles Federal Credit Union, Travis Credit Union, and Commonwealth One Federal Credit Union to its customer ranks—raising the student lending program provider’s list clients to more than 200 credit unions.

Los Angeles Federal and Travis Credit Union have become among the latest credit unions to join the cuStudentLoans program. Los Angeles Federal joins the program as a full lending and participation partner, while Travis joined the member referral program. This allows credit unions to safely refer members to the CUSO managed network, giving members access to a no-fee, low-rate private student loan.

The program, which has grown to 145 credit union lending partners and 22 credit union referral partners, uses common underwriting and pricing and includes loan participation to reduce risks.

“Joining the cuStudentLoans program allows our members to instantly benefit from access to two great loan products in the cuScholar Private Student Loan and the cuGrad Private Student Loan Consolidation,” says Craig Stalnaker, vice president of lending at Los Angeles Federal.

“It was important for us to refer our members to a program that we could trust and was developed and managed by credit unions that are member focused,” said Stacy Fifield, Vice President, Consumer Lending at Travis Credit Union, a participant in the lender referral program that features a non-solicitation agreement to protect member sovereignty.

Fynanz Inc. is a CUNA Strategic Services strategic alliance provider.

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive