Electronic Check Processing: Is Better Good Enough?

It may be time for a new deposit processing model.

April 25, 2012
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

While electronic check processing is a step toward operational efficiency, it doesn't go far enough to eliminate exception processing and associated costs. What's needed is a complete overhaul of the procedures and tools used in deposit processing.

Disappointing branch capture results

As branch capture becomes an accepted practice, many assume that it will decrease exception processing and adjustments. Unfortunately, in the migration to branch capture, many credit unions have just implemented an electronic version of a paper-based operation that uses multiple steps and processing devices.

This increases wait times for members and hinders tellers’ ability to accommodate deposits that include a large number of checks. Without proving out the deposit, discrepancies go undetected.

Poor quality or unusable images and claims against the institutions introducing them into the system can make distributed capture seem like it's just creating more headaches.

And while Check 21 and the subsequent availability of check-scanning devices made it possible for images to be captured anywhere–in theory saving credit unions and their members the time and transportation costs–the risks may outweigh the benefits if allowed to go unchecked.

Implementing branch capture, migrating to teller capture, and making remote deposit capture (RDC) available to commercial accounts can reduce the handling costs of physical documents to some extent.

But none of these strategies resolves the problem of preventable exception adjustments or relieves the time constraints of managing large or complicated deposits.

Obviously, more streamlined processing with fewer exceptions and fewer adjustments is necessary to control rising costs. But there's also a need to re-envision the operation as a whole and to create new tools to mitigate factors that generate exceptions

Rethinking current deposit processing model

Cash and checks have historically been viewed as too different to be processed together. Neither credit unions nor providers have promoted a processing environment where these items are scanned and captured by the same device, let alone by a single operator.

Using a single imaging/scanning tool to process and image checks, cash, deposit slips etc. can bring tremendous operational efficiencies. This would represent a great step forward in the race to achieve up-front balanced deposits and the ultimate solution: straight-through processing (STP).

In STP, check amounts are verified at the point of presentment; transactions credited instantly, like cash; and funds availability improved. Check 21 and the advent of distributed capture set the stage for STP. But many institutions continue to manage cash and checks as separate functions.

Achieving efficiencies

The ability to process, verify, and record an entire deposit using a single machine at the point of presentment definitely changes accepted back counter or teller capture practice. As a result, branches could reduce or eliminate associated costs such as post-capture error correction, multistep deposit processing, and the purchase and maintenance of single-purpose equipment.

Likewise, this capability means members can reap rewards like fewer account adjustments, faster moving lines, large deposits processed quickly, and transactions balanced and verified instantly.

Business accounts also could use this system to process checks for RDC or image cash letter (ICL) deposits, thus reducing transaction errors as well.

With STP, credit unions could double their check-scanning speeds, maintain a 99.5% accuracy rate, and process currency as well as checks.

By redefining the deposit capture process from the point of presentment with technology that brings check, currency, and deposit slip processing together, credit unions could greatly reduce the number of exceptions and greatly improve operational efficiencies.

MATTHEW GNIECH is check image product manager for Cummins Allison, which provides money-handling solutions to the financial industry.

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive