A Proactive Regulatory Approach

NCUA is setting guardrails along the regulatory road, Hyland says.

March 20, 2012
KEYWORDS interest-rate , ncua , risk
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

NCUA Board member Gigi Hyland took the stage at Tuesday’s General Session and recalled two promises she made six years ago during her first GAC appearance:

1. Always put credit union safety and soundness first; and

2. Actively listen to credit union concerns by getting outside the Beltway and talking to individuals one-on-one and in groups.

“I have kept both of those promises,” said Hyland. “Through the most severe financial crisis since the Great Depression, I made policy decisions by asking tough questions and looking at the issues from a 360-degree perspective.”

Recent final and proposed regulations by the NCUA Board address emerging risks for the credit union system, she pointed out. The rules focus on interest-rate risk, CUSOs, loan participations, and emergency liquidity. They come in response to criticisms raised by NCUA’s Inspector General, the Government Accountability Office, and credit unions that NCUA did not act in time to prevent sizeable losses to the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund and the Stabilization Fund.

But the Board is now trying to get ahead of issues and to proactively set guardrails along the regulatory road, she said. For example, NCUA’s final interest-rate risk rule requires most federally insured credit unions to develop and adopt a written policy on interest-rate risk management.  

“Growing real estate portfolios and deposit bases create opportunities for growth, but must be managed wisely, especially in today’s unusual interest-rate environment,” added Hyland. “Taking a proactive regulatory approach to this impending risk for credit unions isn’t meant to place an undue burden on credit unions. Rather, it’s meant to alert you to the issue so you can put the necessary safeguards in place.”

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive