Courage and Conscience

Pulitzer Prize-winning reporters share lessons from Watergate scandal.

March 20, 2012
KEYWORDS government , media , scandal
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Follow all leads, use common sense, and have no preconceived notion of where your story is going. That’s the methodology Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward followed as young metro reporters working for The Washington Post investigating a break-in at the Democratic National Convention headquarters at The Watergate Hotel.

And that’s a different process than many of today’s journalists follow, the Pulitzer Prize-winning writers told the Opening General Session crowd Monday.

The bottom line for the Post, Bernstein said, was "the best attainable version of the truth" and not just the economical bottom line.

Watergate began as a story of a burglary—called "third-rate" by the White House—but it grew into a scandal of dirty campaign tricks and abuse of power at the highest levels in government, culminating with impeachment proceedings and the resignation of President Nixon.

Today, the writers credit the courage and conscience of their sources who told them of illegal acts and who put national interest above personal interest. Katharine Graham, publisher of the Post, showed courage despite threats by the Nixon administration and legal requests to turn over the reporters’ notes, Woodward added. She was "mind on, but hands off" the story, absorbing all of the risk but letting us do our jobs.

"The system worked in a powerful way," he reflected. Republican senators broke party lines to vote to investigate Nixon’s role in the scandal. The Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion to order the release of the Nixon tapes. Today both branches of government are politicized and polarized, he said.

For years, the duo felt there was an "aroma of a deal" about Nixon’s pardon by his successor, President Ford. It would bother them for years. Woodward eventually called Ford for an interview. They spent hours together and Woodward, the relentless reporter, continued to question him about the pardon.

The answer he finally received: He issued the pardon for the country, Ford told him, to preempt the criminal process that had started and connect to the higher purpose of his job as president.

Years later, Ford received the Profile in Courage Award, bestowed by the Kennedy family for putting the country and the national interest first. The moment was "sobering" for us, Woodward said.

On media today, "no one is more critical than we are," Bernstein said, and "there isn’t enough good reporting. People look to the media to reinforce their political beliefs" rather than having an open mind.

The national interest has to guide us as it did in the Watergate scandal, Bernstein said—and not any partisan concerns, ideologies, or money. But for decades now the increasing role of money in politics has made partisanship more possible.

It will be a challenge during the presidential election for the media to come to an appropriate view of the strengths and weaknesses of candidates, Woodward added. The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which allows "super" political action committees to raise unlimited funds, "exponentially allowed new robber barons to use their money and access" for negative campaigning, making it difficult for truths to be heard, he said.

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive