Financial Services Undergoing ‘Secular Shift’

Four forces will fuel the shift to a slow-growth, high-cost operating environment, analysts predict.

March 01, 2012
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

3. How fast can—and should—we drive costs?

Those who believe the industry's current challenges are cyclical will drive out some costs while maintaining the same operating model. But for those who believe, as we do, that a secular shift is under way, a more aggressive approach is necessary.

Investing in new capabilities will be expensive, and funding will have to come from wringing costs out of the operation. Financial institutions must continuously focus on expense control—on how work gets done as well as what work to do—using lean, technology-enabled process redesign to build more flexible, responsive operating models.

In the process, financial institutions should use emerging technologies to drive out complexity and improve the customer experience while also reducing costs—recognizing that these seemingly divergent objectives can now be simultaneously achieved.

Financial institutions must become nimbler and reduce bureaucracy in decision making by optimizing their organizational structure through a re-examination of roles, spans of control, and management layers.

4. How can we get short-term revenue?

Given the challenging revenue climate, many financial institutions are tempted to raise fees on customers to compensate for the shortfall. But imposing new or higher fees without extreme care is a recipe for trouble.

First, and perhaps most obviously, higher fees risk alienating customers. Large banks’ attempt to raise debit card fees offers indisputable proof of this danger. The outcry was intense, from both consumers and politicians.

The inclination to raise fees can also reveal a narrow, transactional view of the interaction that too often fails to take into account the value to consumers. Additionally, it overlooks existing and emerging ways financial institutions can—and will—need to make money in coming years.

Financial institutions need to evaluate ways to create new revenue streams by leveraging their existing information, expertise, and distribution capabilities and assets.

Companies ranging from Amazon to American Express have converted capabilities originally built to drive core businesses into new revenue sources. In these times, every financial institution should do the same.

5. How do we sustain the change?

The Booz report cites four “pillars” to sustainable transformation:

  • Senior direction and sponsorship, with a focus on augmenting capabilities in concert with cutting costs;
  • Ongoing performance management, including a shift in efficiency philosophy toward one that emphasizes continuous improvement;
  • Redesign of core processes via strategic planning and investment prioritization to address sustainability requirements and track progress; and
  • Leadership behavior to ensure leaders set the right example and close skill and competency gaps.

Click here for more information on Booz & Co.'s 2012 Financial Services—Retail Banking Industry Perspective.

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive