Top 10 ‘Additional Triggers’

Red flags examiners should watch for as signs that a CU is failing.

March 22, 2012
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

The recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) report regarding NCUA and failed credit unions was an eye-opener—primarily due to its use of the words “government” and “accountability” in a manner that might lead a reader to think they’re compatible.

The results of the report were interesting. Specifically, after describing NCUA as “a bunch of people with the intelligence and stamina of gnats in heat” (I might be mixing it up with something I read from the American Bankers Association), the report recommended changes in two areas.

An NCUA press release says the GAO recommended that NCUA:

  1. Provide the agency’s inspector general the necessary documentation to verify loss estimates for the corporate stabilization fund; and
  2. Consider additional triggers for prompt corrective action (PCA) that would require early and forceful regulatory action and offer proposals to Congress on how to modify PCA, as appropriate.

Regarding the first issue, the best way for NCUA to document its loss estimate is by grabbing a dart board, two dice, and a copy of a 1972 edition of The Wall Street Journal.

But the second point—referring to a trigger and PCA—is the one we might all regret. Are there indicators a credit union is headed for trouble?

Or better yet, indicators that credit union management might be thinking about a situation which could eventually lead them to a decision whereby they may or may not make a decision which could, indirectly, affect the long-term viability? (Yes, I am thinking like an examiner).

This seems to be the question the GAO posed.

James Collins
James Collins is Credit Union Magazine's humor columnist.

I truly appreciate the hard work of our examiners, so it’s time for the credit union movement to lend them a hand. Rather than prying them away from writing up our allowance accounts as being underfunded (even when credit unions are 500% overreserved and have taken the tack of charging off loans as soon as they’re booked), it’s up to us to help them out.

So let’s count down the top 10 red flags NCUA examiners should heed when reviewing credit unions:

10. The strategic plan includes the words “avoid jail time” and “felony.”
9. The credit union still considers the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund to be an “asset.”
8. When you ask for the credit union’s list of nonperforming assets, the board and management point to the CFO.
7. The credit union’s information technology department is almost prepared for Y2K.
6. Loan staff don’t think they have insider loans because all loans “were signed in the parking lot.”
5. Credit union staff consider their workplace a “family friendly credit union,” which seems appropriate until you find out every employee is, indeed, a family member.
4. When you ask about “reserves” they point you to a nice 1992 Reserve Merlot.
3. The CEO reminisces about his time in the war; then you find out it was the Civil War.
2. You see a “For Sale by Owner” sign on the front lawn.
1. Management expresses keen interest in becoming a bank.

Humor aside, the GAO report did leave an open question. After the reports about failed credit unions (and living through multiple exams myself), here are my five true-life recommendations for examiners:

  1. If it looks too good to be true, it probably is. Managing a credit union is a difficult balancing task.
  2. Turnover is a double-edged sword. While too much turnover is a bad sign, never having turnover is also a red flag.
  3. Never put much faith in the thoroughness of the last exam. If you doubt this one, read the GAO report.
  4. Don’t be destructive. Tell credit unions when they’re doing well. To most of us, an examination is akin to asking an ex-spouse what he or she thinks of us now.
  5. Remember, whatever you do, credit union employees are innocent until proven guilty. We’re not potential criminals—99% of us are trying to do the best job we can, frankly, in an environment that’s both unforgiving and difficult to predict.

JAMES COLLINS is president/CEO at O Bee CU, Tumwater, Wash. Contact him at 360-943-0740.

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive