Compliance

Compliance: Never Let Your Guard Down

A case in point involves the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.

November 23, 2011
KEYWORDS bank , discrimination , ecoa , loan
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Regulatory compliance in financial services requires continual vigilance and never-ending attention to detail. We’ve seen a lot of new regulations in recent years, and implementing those new requirements has taken a great deal of time and effort.

But we can’t let our guard down in adhering to long-standing rules. Case in point: The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA).

Adopted by Congress in 1974, ECOA, as implemented by Regulation B, prohibits financial institutions from discriminating against loan applicants based on race, color, religion, national origin, gender, marital status, age, income derived from any public assistance program, or their exercise of any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act.

Penalties for violating ECOA, intentionally or unintentionally, can be quite severe, as a small community bank in southeast Texas recently discovered.

According to information filed in a lawsuit against Nixon State Bank by the U.S. Department of Justice, the $69 million asset bank (with total equity capital of $6.65 million) gave its loan officers broad discretion in making loan decisions.

Subscribe to Credit Union MagazineThe bank did not require a written application or credit report, use a uniform pricing system such as a matrix or rate sheet, or document the reasons for loan denials. In 2006, an independent auditor identified those flaws and recommended that the bank develop more consistent policies and procedures.

Nixon State Bank did take action on those recommendations in 2009. But by then the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. had turned over the results of its examination of the bank’s ECOA compliance to the Justice Department, which filed a civil suit alleging a pattern of discrimination against Hispanic loan applicants by requiring them to pay consistently higher rates than other borrowers.

On the same day the lawsuit was filed in June, the Justice Department filed a motion for a proposed order for the court to sign, indicating the parties had reached an agreement even before the suit was filed.

Under the proposed order, the bank doesn’t acknowledge any wrongdoing, but it agrees to:

  • Train its loan officers on fair lending practices and monitor their performance;
  • Revise its loan pricing policies;
  • Create a $100,000 fund to compensate victims of past discrimination; and
  • Submit regular compliance reports to the Justice Department for the next four years.

This case underscores several significant considerations for credit unions, name that federal regulators have their collective eye on financial institutions of all sizes.

The nation’s biggest banks have commanded headlines in recent years, but regulators haven’t been sidetracked from oversight of compliance at smaller banks and credit unions.

In addition, violations of ECOA and other laws and regulations carry heavy penalties in terms of fines, required operational overhauls, and intense scrutiny—not to mention the potential damage to reputation among existing and potential members.

Credit unions aren’t immune to these kinds of action. It’s imperative that credit union executives review their processes, compensation plans, pricing matrices, loan officer pricing discretion guidelines, and any other process that may result in a review and a referral to the Department of Justice.

This cautionary example calls to mind American author Finley Peter Dunne’s observation that “politics ain’t beanbag.” Neither is regulatory compliance.

Failure to comply with laws and regulations—from the plethora of new rules coming out of the nation’s capital to the foundation of consumer financial services regulation established four decades past—will result in serious penalties that won’t just bounce off harmlessly.

BILL KLEWIN is CUNA Mutual Group’s director of regulatory compliance.

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive