Students Weigh Higher Education Options

Attendance at for-profit schools has more than tripled in the past decade.

September 06, 2011
KEYWORDS loans , student
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Higher education tuition and fees have more than doubled since 2000—a rate faster than real estate appreciation during the housing bubble, according to a study on student lending by Moody’s Analytics.

Student loan performance has been consistent, as well as delinquency and loss rates on outstanding student loans, the study reports. Student lending is still growing quickly, though less quickly than in recent years. Origination numbers are also increasing.

Driving the demand for loans are demographics and education costs. The 16- to 24-year-old demographic is growing, and today, 40% of high school graduates pursue some type of higher education.

When faced with limited job prospects, many pursue further education, hoping they’ll find a better job upon completion, according to the report. But today, students must incur more debt to complete a program, and still can’t find jobs upon graduation. This will likely dissuade some students from pursuing higher education.

For those choosing to still pursue further education, there ‘s limited school financial aid. The amount depends on the economic cycle and government policies, as well as endowment and grant performance, says the survey.

Other trends the report cites:

• Students are considering alternative programs. One nontraditional option is the for-profit school. Though its enrollment comprises less than 10% of all students, growth has more than tripled in the past decade.

For-profit schools, vocational schools, and online colleges cater to high school graduates and older students, offering a flexible class schedule. But schools generally suffer from low graduation rates and a lack of in-demand degrees offered. And when students don’t graduate, they still must repay their student loans, but with no extra qualifications.

• Private loan volume has dramatically increased. And these loans are now being used to finance other expenses besides education-related services.

• Legislation has changed the student lending game. The most dramatic change was the elimination of the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), in which the government directly subsidized loans, and financial institutions could no longer collect a fee for offering these loans.

• Student loan delinquencies are increasing. Recent student loan originations are actually performing worse than those from the lending boom, which means student loan origination standards haven’t been tightened as other loan standards were, according to the report.

Moody’s Analytics predicts the 16- to 29-year-old demographic will peak this year, remain high until late 2012, and then decline in 2014. With that, the company predicts the percentage of high school graduates—potential borrowers—pursuing further education will increase.

Moody’s predicts the growth rate of total tuition will slow as more students pursue less expensive education options, although tuition will continue to rise quicker than overall inflation for the next decade.

The company also predicts delinquency and failure rates will rise because students won’t be able to pay their loans, as income remains lower than what student borrowers anticipated.

Overall, student loans haven’t shown much improvement despite broader economic improvements. Today a degree doesn’t necessarily mean a student can repay their loans, and as a result, students may pursue cheaper options for higher education, or forgo it altogether, the company points out.

Moody’s says this could mean a less educated work force, and therefore, a less productive one—which would be detrimental to the U.S. economy, especially relative to other countries.

Next: Sorting out the schools

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive