The 14-Day Question

Fed’s Reg Z final rules affect when CUs must send periodic statements.

September 24, 2011
KEYWORDS payment , requirement , rule
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

In the July issue, I covered three significant changes to the Federal Reserve Board’s March 2011 Regulation Z final rule regarding prior rule changes implementing the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009. The column addressed employee preferential rates, floor rates, and consumers’ ability to pay.

This column covers an additional significant change concerning the timing of periodic statements.

For credit cards and other open-end loans with a grace period, the Fed’s February 2010 (and August 2009) Reg Z final rules required credit unions to mail or deliver periodic statements at least 21 days before the payment due date and the expiration of any grace period.

For all other open-end loans, a credit union must mail or deliver each periodic statement at least 14 days before the date on which the minimum payment must be received in order to avoid being treated as late for any purpose.

For credit unions that offer no courtesy period, this would be the actual payment due date. For credit unions that offer a courtesy period, this would be the end of the courtesy period (as long as the account isn't treated as late for any other reason before this date).

Subscribe to Credit Union MagazineSome credit unions are confused about this requirement or upset that this rule seems to have suddenly appeared in the Fed’s March 2011 final rule. A short review may alleviate some confusion.

In early 2009, before the Reg Z amendments implementing the CARD Act, creditors were required to mail or deliver periodic statements at least 14 days before the expiration of a grace period or before the payment due date to avoid other charges.

In August 2009, the CARD Act imposed a 21-day timing requirement regarding periodic statements for all open-end loans. After seeing the immense problems credit unions had in complying with this requirement, CUNA approached Congress to request a change in the law.

This led to the passage of the CARD Act Technical Corrections Act in November 2009, which narrowed the 21-day timing requirement from all open-end loans to just credit card accounts and open-end loans with a grace period. The February 2010 Reg Z final rule implemented this change.

The Fed, however, should have provided language in this same final rule for the 14-day timing requirement that applied to other open-end loans. But the agency inadvertently failed to reinsert this requirement in the final rule.

The Fed realized this error and in its March 2011 Reg Z final rule regarding CARD Act clarifications, reinserted the 14-day timing requirement effective Oct. 1, 2011.

It requires credit unions to adopt reasonable procedures to ensure:

  • Periodic statements are mailed or delivered at least 14 days before the due date (provided on the statement) so the payment isn’t considered late; and
  • Payments received on or before that date aren’t treated as late for any purpose, such as increasing the annual percentage rate as a penalty, reporting the consumer as delinquent to a credit reporting agency, or assessing a late fee.

Next: How to comply

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive