New Rules Present New Risks for CU Directors

Directors’ best protection against legal action is a solid understanding of their fiduciary duties.

August 05, 2011
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

New fiduciary and financial literacy rules for directors of federally chartered credit unions, coupled with economic challenges and more litigation, have greatly increased personal risk exposure for credit union decision makers.

But while this uncertain environment increases the chance of legal action against credit union directors, it also provides an opportunity to establish new practices to protect credit unions and their board members, a CUNA Mutual Group executive told a breakout session audience Thursday during the 34th Annual National Directors’ Convention in Las Vegas.

John Wallace, CUNA Mutual’s vice president of commercial products, said there are four keys to protecting directors’ personal assets, starting with a solid understanding of their fiduciary duties.

In December, NCUA finalized sections from its rules and regulations concerning federal credit union directors’ fiduciary duties and indemnification. “Federal credit union directors must carry out their duties in good faith, and within six months of their election or appointment they must also gain an understanding of basic finance and accounting practices,” he said.

NCUA also passed a rule on indemnification that strips federal credit unions of the ability to indemnify officials or employees for liability associated with misconduct that’s “grossly negligent, reckless, or willful” as deemed by a court in connection with a decision that affects the “fundamental rights” of credit unions’ members.

This applies to decisions affecting members’ rights, such as with conversions and changing share insurance.

In addition, NCUA “Rule 750” limits indemnification payments by credit unions.

Recent actions by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) provide some context and might be a precursor for what credit union directors could face. As of July 6, FDIC authorized action against 248 individuals in connection with 28 failed institutions, seeking $6.8 billion.

A second way directors can protect themselves is by establishing and/or broadening their corporate governance process, which Wallace defined as “a set of processes, customs, rules, policies, and laws that guide how an organization, like a credit union, is directed and controlled for the benefit of its stakeholders.”

Examples include establishing a lead director on governance, a whistle-blower policy, or a risk oversight policy.

Third, Wallace urged directors to consider their indemnification options to ensure alignment with the board’s risk philosophy. Indemnification is where the credit union agrees to reimburse an officer or director for expenses related to claims brought against them in their capacity as officers and directors.

“Consult a qualified attorney to help you construct your indemnification agreements,” Wallace said. “This is particularly important given the newly adopted rule that limits indemnification.”

Fourth and finally, Wallace advised credit unions to have directors’ and officers’ (D&O) liability insurance coverage to cover losses related to claims against a wrongful management liability act. Boards should play an active role in establishing the type and coverage limits for D&O insurance, he added.

Other recommendations Wallace offered to help directors protect their personal assets and their credit unions:

  • Conduct conflict of interest disclosures at least annually;
  • Determine, as a board, what risks the credit unions faces and ask for information to monitor that risk; and
  • Think of opportunities to improve.

The 34th Annual National Directors’ Conference continues through Friday.

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive