Community Service

When the GAO Calls, People Listen—and Speak Up

The need for financial education continues, and CUs will continue to fill that need.

June 01, 2011
KEYWORDS education , financial
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

So when the Government Accountability Office (GAO) called earlier this spring seeking feedback from CUNA’s personal finance department about financial literacy, we were all ears and, well, mouthy, too.

We told them credit unions have been providing financial education materials and instruction to their members for at least 50 years. We know that because that’s when CUNA started distributing resources to credit unions and their members, first with Everybody’s Money, a quarterly digest magazine, and later with a host of online, print, and in-person materials often segmented by life stage—just as you segment marketing to members.

The GAO conducted its study as part of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The agency was trying to determine a) whether financial literacy training works, and b) the feasibility of certifying financial literacy service providers.

After reviewing 29 separate studies, GAO found “no one approach, delivery mechanism, or technology constitutes a best practice.”

GAO did find successful financial education programs are timely (relevant), accessible, culturally sensitive, and include an evaluation component.

In fact, the study said the most effective approaches may include a mix of options—suggesting that any one provider that thinks its all-in-one program can be all things to all age (and demographic) groups is kidding itself—and you.

When it came to evaluating whether providers should be certified and whether the federal government should provide that Good Housekeeping stamp of approval, the GAO correctly noted that federal certification would require significant staff and financial resources at a time when, frankly, there’s not much political will (or money) to make that happen.

It was refreshing to note that the National Endowment for Financial Education (NEFE), a program CUNA, the state leagues and foundations, and the Co-Op Network have put their collective muscle behind since 2000, was cited throughout the report (pdf).

Susan Tiffany
Susan Tiffany

NEFE was among the first to have independent verification that its High School Financial Planning Program could significantly improve students’ financial knowledge, behavior, and confidence.

Philip Heckman
Philip Heckman

In reading the GAO’s report, it was also interesting how many of the findings were things that CUNA’s participants in the GAO study—Susan Tiffany, director of online consumer periodicals, and Philip Heckman, director of financial education product development and delivery—shared with the interviewers:

  • Make the information relevant, using just-in-time delivery across a variety of formats: in person, print, or online;
  • Focus on changing attitudes and behaviors;
  • Learn best by doing;
  • Don’t rule out new delivery mechanisms that may not even exist yet;
  • Make employees join 401(k) programs to guard against complacency; and
  • Measure results with pre- and post-testing.

When asked if the government should oversee accreditation, CUNA’s representatives opted to recommend colleges and universities instead, worrying that government oversight might stifle creativity—and look like another regulatory burden for credit unions that have been providing financial education to members for many, many years.

The GAO report now goes to the banking/finance committees of the Senate and House where it will be reviewed and evaluated. But one thing is certain: The need for financial education continues. And credit unions will continue to fill that need.

JAMES HANSON is vice president of CUNA’s business-to-consumer publishing department.

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive