Assess the Integrity of Your ‘Soft’ Controls

Adhering to these subjective guidelines can promote ethical behavior, innovation, and accountability.

July 13, 2011
KEYWORDS audit , ethics , management
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Unlike clearly defined internal controls, “soft” controls are subjective, intangible, and hard to audit, according to a recent issue of Credit Union Directors Newsletter.

“Best Practices: Evaluating the Corporate Culture,” published by the Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, considered organizations’ creative practices meant to ensure soft controls’ success.

Soft controls can include:Directors Newsletter

  • Integrity and ethical values;
  • Commitment to competence;
  • The structure of reporting relationships;
  • Employee motivation; and
  • Information flow throughout the organization.

Also important are the extent of board or audit committees' understanding of the organization, management leadership, and efforts to establish mutual trust in the workplace.

Past results indicate the need for assessing the integrity of soft controls. “It’s essential to provide management and the board assurance that the organization won’t join the ranks of those that have been brought to their knees by lagging ethics and a weak corporate culture,” the auditing group says.

But business units can still create a contradictive subculture even if executive management models good ethics. This magnifies the difficulty of assessing soft controls in determining whether a gap exists between stated and actual corporate values.

Some guidelines on reporting and evaluating soft controls:

  • Require formal reports so long as an adversarial relationship isn’t created with audited managers.
  • Auditors must provide persuasive evidence, express their perception to the responsible manager, and allow individuals to fix the situations without involving upper management.

The report calls Enron the “worst practice” example. Its formal governance structure seemingly was strong, but the information communications and management behavior created a culture almost diametrically opposed to its stated values.

An internal audit department evaluating soft controls likely would have identified the gaps between declared corporate values and values actually practiced.

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive