The Art of Interest-Rate Swaps

When hedging forward repricings of short-term liabilities, one approach is to use an interest-rate swap.

May 26, 2011
KEYWORDS duration , hedge , swap
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

By Robert B. Perry and Hafizan G. Hamzah

When hedging forward repricings of short-term liabilities, one approach is to use an interest-rate swap.

Many financial executives agree the goal of most liability hedging transactions is to effectively reduce the variability of future interest expense and obtain hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133. This article explores such an option and shows how an interest-rate swap affects a financial institution’s balance sheet, interest-rate risk profile, and net interest margin.

Consider this scenario: XYZ Financial Institution would like to hedge a bucket of six-month time deposits that are characterized by an average duration of three months. The principal value of this bucket is $75 million.

The institution would like to synthetically extend the duration of this bucket to five years using a pay fixed/receive floating interest-rate swap. More demand for fixed-rate commercial real estate loans has created the need for longer duration funding to better finance (match) the new asset growth.

XYZ has had little luck attracting five-year time deposits through pricing and promotions. For simplicity, its balance sheet consists of one bucket of assets and one bucket of liabilities.

The bucket of assets is $75 million of fixed-rate, commercial real estate loans that balloon in five or seven years and amortize over 25 years. The liability funding these loans is the bucket of six-month time deposits. The time deposits reprice every six months with one-sixth of the bucket rolling monthly.

The following exhibits describe the balance sheet, interest-rate risk and net-interest margin sensitivity.

Exhibit 1 [pdf] shows XYZ’s market value sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Pre-swap, XYZ exhibits an average sensitivity, or effective duration, of 4.32% for rates up and down 100 basis points (bp).

Overlaying the swap’s market value sensitivity onto XYZ’s balance sheet decreases the measure to 0.04%. The sensitivity is reduced by extending the duration of the bucket of six-month time deposits synthetically.

Exhibit 2 [pdf] describes the difference in effective duration (elasticity) of XYZ’s liabilities pre- and post-swap. The duration is extended by 4.27%, from 0.29% to 4.56%.

Exhibit 3 [pdf] shows XYZ’s net interest margin (NIM) sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Pre-swap, XYZ’s NIM for parallel rate shifts up and down 100 bp has a range of 137 bp, from 4.27% in the down 100 bp shift to 2.9% in the up 100 bp shift.

After overlaying the sensitivity of the interest-rate swap, the variability in NIM decreases to 16 bp. Post-swap in the down 100 bp, NIM is 3.18%, while in the up 100 bp shift, it is 3.02%. This is a difference in variability of 121 bp.

XYZ’s NIM changes from 3.59% to 2.21% [pdf] with a 200 bp increase in rates pre-swap. Post-swap, the change is 3.1% to 2.93% with the same change in rates.

Through the up and down 200 bp shifts, pre-swap XYZ’s NIM has a range of 275 bp. Post-swap, that range is reduced to 32 bp.

The difference in base NIM pre- and post-swap of 49 bp is greater than would be expected in an average institution. XYZ’s duration gap between assets and liabilities is larger than that of a normal institution because of the simplicity of its balance sheet.

Next: Maintaining hedge accounting treatment

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive