May sees strength in ‘one’ voice

CUNA chairman urges CUs to speak with one, united voice on the issues.

March 02, 2011
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

“Your involvement in our political advocacy efforts will be essential,” CUNA Chairman Harriet May told a General Session audience Tuesday.

May referenced the song “One” by Three Dog Night, who rocked the GAC on Sunday. “It’s a good song” but she differs on the line that says “one is the loneliest number.” When it comes to credit unions at the GAC, she thinks about “one” in a different way.

“When I look out at all of you in this large audience, a different phrase comes to mind,” said May, president/CEO, GECU, El Paso, Texas. “It’s the phrase on the Great Seal of the United States: E Pluribus Unum—“Out of many, one.”

At the GAC, she said, this is what we are: Credit unions from every state and hundreds of communities across the nation, united by a common purpose, shared values, a rich history, and a unique, member-driven philosophy—or, “out of many, one.”

And on Capitol Hill, “one isn’t the loneliest number, it’s the strongest number,” she said. “When we are united—speak with one, common voice on the issues—we are at our maximum strength. Conversely, when we splinter and become divided, we become weaker, politically.”

Getting legislation through Congress today will be challenging, she said. Congress itself is divided, and “the last thing we want to do is to make our task even harder by splintering our message and failing to present a united front.”

May urged credit unions to take a broader view on the issues, such as interchange or member business lending, when talking with legislators. “It will make those who do need additional authorities stronger. And that, in turn, makes the movement stronger.”

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory ( will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive