Operations

Expect Fewer Corporates in CUs’ Future

The corporate CU network will focus more on settlement and payment services; less on investments.

March 04, 2011
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

The corporate credit union network of the future will be made up of fewer corporates, they’ll be more focused on settlement and payment services, and less focused on investment services, according to panelists discussing corporate credit unions’ future at the Tuesday General Session.

The panelists were Larry Fazio, NCUA’s deputy executive director; Scott Hunt, NCUA’s director of the office of corporate credit unions; and Terry West, CUNA’s Corporate Credit Union Task Force chairman. The panel was moderated by Bill Hampel, CUNA’s chief economist and senior vice president of research and policy analysis.

“The future corporate credit union model will look quite different from what we’ve known in the past,” said West. “The new model will move investments off the balance sheet and employ more of a risk-based model.”

“In the past, corporates have used some of their investment income to offset the costs of providing payment and settlement services,” said Hampel. “How will corporates be able to offer competitive pricing on their payment services without that investment income?”

“There will have to be considerable consolidation among corporates to increase efficiency,” said West.

As credit unions have discussions about whether or not to recapitalize their corporates, West recommended credit unions do their homework and always have “a back-up option in case your corporate goes in a direction you didn’t anticipate.”

NCUA’s Fazio said credit unions can expect corporate stabilization assessments of 20 to 25 basis points in 2011. “Assessment levels will be somewhat elevated in 2011 and 2012,” he said. Fazio estimated total credit losses from the entire corporate resolution process of between $14 billion and $16 billion.

Corporates have until Oct. 20, 2011, to have 4% regulatory capital and a 2% net economic value ratio, according to NCUA’s Hunt. Corporates that aren’t already at those levels must submit a business plan to NCUA by March 31 explaining how they’ll get there.

“Corporates can achieve those levels by generating earnings, removing assets, or raising additional capital from their member credit unions,” Hunt said.

Even though significant consolidation among corporates is expected, NCUA has no merger applications pending at this time. “NCUA has no directive for consolidation among corporates, nor will the agency use its power of conservatorship to promote consolidation,” said Hunt.

"No" to Corporates

Ken Simpson
March 09, 2011 4:20 pm
I am strongly encouraging my fellow credit union directors to not have anything more to do with the corporate credit union model. Whatever benefits we may have derived from ours in the past is not worth how we were almost sunk by its failed investment practices.The risk of a repeat performance is just too great.


Flag Comment as Offensive

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive