Compliance

Interchange Proposal Tops Regulatory Priorities

CUNA outlines top issues on the regulatory docket.

February 03, 2011
KEYWORDS banking , board , interchange , ncua
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

CUNA continues to address a number of key regulatory issues, including proposals from the Federal Reserve Board and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), plus financial literacy requirements for directors and guidance on corporate credit unions and internet banking authentication.

Debit interchange proposal

CUNA President/CEO Bill Cheney says there’s no higher policy priority for CUNA at this time than to improve the “potentially horrendous” outcome under the Federal Reserve Board’s debit interchange proposal that will be inflicted on credit unions offering debit card programs if significant changes aren’t made.

CUNA’s Operation Comment has generated 3,600 letters from credit unions on this issue. “We’re grateful to the leagues and to credit unions for generating so many letters and for continuing to weigh-in with policy makers,” Cheney says. “In addition, I commend leagues that have organized their own interchange working groups.”

CUNA is preparing for the Feb. 17 hearing of the House Financial Services Committee’s Financial Institutions Subcommittee that addresses the Fed’s proposal and the debit card interchange amendment.

CUNA strongly urged this hearing and, along with leagues, is meeting with key legislators and staff to ensure they understand why the proposal and statute combine to disadvantage, not protect, credit unions and other small issuers.

FASB proposal

On a positive note, FASB reversed its position that the vast majority of financial assets and liabilities should be recorded at fair value. FASB issued an exposure draft in May 2010 that would greatly expand the use of fair value accounting for financial instruments.

The agency has reviewed the exposure draft’s proposed changes since the comment period ended last October, and the board members agreed to allow as an exception to the fair value requirement that loan products can be recorded at their amortized cost.

CUNA strongly supports FASB’s tentative decision, which expresses acknowledgement by the Board that fair value as a measurement approach is inappropriate for certain items, such as “simple plain vanilla instruments” that an entity does not actively trade but holds to maturity.

While this development is positive, other aspects of the financial instruments proposal, such as the requirement to fair value debt securities, are worrisome. CUNA will continue to work with FASB and its parent entity, the Financial Accounting Foundation, to ensure credit unions’ concerns are heard and hopefully to minimize the negative effects that the proposal would likely have on credit unions and other reporting entities.

Next: Financial literacy for directors

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive