Crime Grows 15.6% During Third Quarter

Robberies and other crimes at CUs rose 5.8% during this period.

February 01, 2011
KEYWORDS banks , crimes , robberies
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

There were 1,325 financial institution crimes reported during the third quarter of 2010, up from 1,146 crimes reported during the second quarter, the Federal Bureau of Investigation reports—a 15.6% increase.

This includes 1,310 robberies, 13 burglaries, two larcenies, and six extortions of financial institutions reported between July 1, 2010 and Sept. 30, 2010.

There was far more crime at commercial banks (1,183 robberies, 10 burglaries, and two larcenies) than at credit unions (90 robberies and one burglary) during this period. Credit unions reported 85 robberies and one burglary during the second quarter.

Savings and loan associations suffered 25 robberies and mutual savings banks experienced 11 robberies and two burglaries.

Other highlights:

  • Loot was taken in 90% of the incidents, totaling more than $9.3 million;
  • Of the loot taken, 20% (nearly $1.4 million) was recovered and returned to the financial institutions;
  • These crimes occur most frequently on Friday;
  • Criminals are most likely to strike between 9-11 a.m.;
  • Criminals are far more likely to be male than female;
  • Acts of violence were committed in 4% of the incidents, resulting in 21 injuries, four deaths, and nine people being taken hostage;
  • Demand notes were the most common modus operandi used, followed closely by oral demands; and
  • Most violations occurred in the southern region of the U.S., with 482 reported incidents.

Read the full report here.

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive