Assessments Less Onerous for CUs Than Banks

CUs likely will pay about one-third less than banks over the next 11 years.

November 30, 2010
KEYWORDS fdic , funds , ncua , stabilization
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Recent NCUA actions

Over the past several months, NCUA took the following actions pertaining to the NCUSIF and the Corporate Stabilization Fund:

  • In June, assessed a 2010 Corporate Stabilization Fund assessment of 13.4 bp;
  • In September, assessed a 2010 NCUSIF premium of 12.42 bp, bringing the fund’s equity ratio to its normal operating level of 1.3% of insured shares.

The combined assessments for the year are therefore 25.82 bp of insured shares.

In September, NCUA conserved three corporate credit unions (in addition to the two conserved last year) and announced a plan to deal with the “legacy assets” of the five conserved corporates with the following implications:

• Roughly $50 billion of legacy assets will be funded by $35 billion of guaranteed notes, with final maturities ranging to 2021.

• This funding is based on expected ultimate credit losses of around $15 billion on the $50 billion of legacy assets.

Of the $15 billion of estimated losses, $6.9 billion has already been paid ($5.6 billion from extinguished capital at the five conserved corporates and $1.3 billion paid by credit unions in previous assessments this year and last year). That leaves $8.1 billion yet to be paid by credit unions (to be assessed by NCUA) over the remaining term of the Corporate Stabilization Fund.

Because the notes funding the legacy assets will have maturities to 2021, the remaining term of the Corporate Stabilization Fund was extended from five to 11 years.

• In November, announced estimated ranges for 2011 assessments of 0 bp to 10 bp for the NCUSIF premium, and 20 bp to 25 bp for the Corporate Stabilization assessment.

Next: Recent FDIC actions

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive