Assessments Less Onerous for CUs Than Banks

CUs likely will pay about one-third less than banks over the next 11 years.

November 30, 2010
KEYWORDS fdic , funds , ncua , stabilization
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Recent FDIC actions

At its October Board meeting, the FDIC updated its estimate of the condition of the BIF, and proposed a long-term plan for management of the fund, consistent with changes to FDIC’s statutory authorities in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act.

Because of reduced estimates of insurance losses for 2010, FIDC’s reserve ratio has risen from minus 38 bp of insured deposits as of March 2010 to minus 15 bp as of September.

This, coupled with the extension of the time for the fund to reach the designated reserve ratio (DRR), the target level, from 2016 to 2020, allowed the agency to announce the suspension of a 3 bp assessment increase, previously planned for the first quarter of 2011.

The proposed fund management plan takes into account the following statutory changes in the Dodd Frank Act:

  • Raises the DRR to 1.35% from 1.15%, and removes the upper limit on the DRR (formerly capped at 1.5%);
  • Requires that the fund ratio reach 1.35% by 2020 (from the previous target of 1.15% by 2016);
  • Requires that only banks with more than $10 billion in assets be assessed the amount necessary to raise the reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%;
  • Eliminates the requirement that FDIC pay dividends when the fund is between 1.35% and 1.5%; and
  • Allows, but does not require, the fund to pay dividends when the reserve ratio exceeds 1.5%.

Next: A tale of two funds

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive