Compliance

Fed Provides CARD Act Clarification

Does changing from a nonvariable rate to a variable rate trigger the duty to review the account?

November 24, 2010
KEYWORDS card , compliance , rate
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Recently the Fed provided us with another proposal related to the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009.

However, this one is actually helpful.

Although it attempts to close some loopholes that were discovered during implementation, it also contains several necessary clarifications.

One of those clarifications relates to a reevaluation of rate increases for credit unions that changed the type of rate–non-variable to variable–without actually changing the rate.

During the CARD Act implemenation fiasco, many credit unions switched from nonvariable to variable rates. Although the type of rate changed, the margin was set so that the new variable rate was not an increase from the old nonvariable rate.

The question under the re-evaluation provision (Reg Z, section 226.59) was, does changing from a nonvariable rate to a variable rate trigger the duty to periodically review the account, even though the rate did not increase?

The current rule (effective August 22, 2010) didn’t specifically speak to this situation, and in other instances the rules generally address a change in the type of rate as equivalent to a rate increase because the rate may eventually increase.

Therefore, the conservative route under the current rule is to treat a change to a variable rate as a rate increase and begin reviewing the account periodically.

However, under the proposed rule, it states that a change from a nonvariable rate to a variable rate generally is not a rate increase for purposes of re-evaluation, if there is no increase in the rate at the time it is changed to a variable rate.

For example, if you had a nonvariable rate of 12% and you did a proper change in terms under the rule to a variable rate of 12%, until the variable rate exceeds 12%, you do not have to begin periodically reviewing the account under Reg Z, section 226.59.

So, watch for the final rule with the hope that it is adopted as proposed.

ANDREA STRITZKE is vice president, regulatory compliance, for PolicyWorks, Des Moines, Iowa, and a frequent contributor to The Works, a compliance blog. Contact her at 866-518-0209. PolicyWorks provides regulatory compliance solutions for credit unions and government and public affairs consulting.

Editor's note: This article originally appeared as a blog entry on The Works. Visit our compliance page for regular updates to The Works.

The Works Blog

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive