CUNA Seeks Comments on Proposed Corporate IRPS

CUs should submit comments to CUNA by Oct. 26.

October 12, 2010
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

As part of its overall efforts to reform the corporate credit union system, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) has issued a proposed Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS) to provide guidance on the requirements and process for chartering federal corporate credit unions.

The proposed IRPS describes the standards the agency would use and the timeline it would follow for evaluating applications.

Under the proposal, charter applications would need to include substantial information, including a detailed business plan and various NCUA forms.

NCUA’s objectives in proposing the guidance are to:

  • Uphold the provisions of the Federal Credit Union Act;
  • Promote safety and soundness within the credit union industry; and
  • Provide quality services to members.

A corporate charter application would need to be submitted by a group of at least seven people that represent natural person credit unions.

Before chartering a corporate, NCUA must be satisfied that the institution will be viable and that it will provide needed services to its members.

The NCUA Office of Corporate Credit Unions will conduct an independent investigation of the corporate credit union’s charter application to assess the economic and long-term viability of the proposed corporate.

Any applications submitted to NCUA prior to the final IRPS must be in compliance with the terms of this proposal.

NCUA is accepting public comments until Nov. 1. CUNA asks credit unions to submit comments on the proposed IRPS to Mary Dunn, CUNA’s senior vice president/deputy general counsel, or Luke Martone by Oct. 26.

Credit unions can contact CUNA at 800-356-9655, ext. 6743, with questions.

5 Questions to Consider Regarding the Proposed IRPS

1. There’s currently no guidance for the chartering of federal corporate credit unions. Is there a need for guidance in this area?

2. Do you believe the proposed collection of information would be necessary for NCUA to properly perform its functions as the regulator of corporate credit unions? Would this information have a practical use?

3. NCUA estimates the burden on each charter applicant at approximately 330 hours—primarily related to the proposed business plan requirement. Do you agree with the accuracy of this estimate? Assuming 330 hours is accurate, is it reasonable to expect such a time commitment for corporate charter applicants?

4. Under the proposal, corporate charter applications received by NCUA before the final IRPS is adopted must be in compliance with the proposal. Do you agree that such treatment is appropriate?

5. The proposed IRPS describes in detail the timeline of the charter application review process. Is the proposed timeline reasonable? Do you know of any reason why NCUA should not offer a timeline of the process?

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive