Operations

CUNA Deflects Bankers' 'Deceptive Rhetoric'

Cheney meets with Treasury to set the record straight.

October 08, 2010
KEYWORDS cuna , taxpayer , treasury
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

The corporate credit union-related problems credit unions are paying for today—with their own money, not taxpayers’—have nothing to do with imprudent lending standards, as claimed by the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA).

Such charges are a thinly veiled attempt by bankers to use the corporate situation to further their anti-credit union agenda.

That’s the gist of a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner that CUNA President/CEO Bill Cheney delivered during a meeting with Michael Barr, the Treasury Department’s assistant secretary for financial institutions.

Cheney points out that ICBA’s arguments rely on inaccuracies and falsehoods.

The CUNA president informs Geithner that “the corporate credit union situation was caused by highly rated investments made by the corporate credit unions going sour during the most significant financial crisis of the last 80 years.

“Corporate credit unions invested natural person credit union money in the same type of asset-backed securities that have become infamous during this crisis. The problems that credit unions are paying for today—with their own money, not taxpayer money—have nothing to do with imprudent lending standards."

Cheney’s letter notes credit unions’ longstanding history of making loans, including business loans, more prudently than community banks. He cites the fact that since 1997, the loss rate on credit union business loans has averaged only 0.15% compared to 0.82% at banks.

Even in the recent recession, when losses have increased across the board, 2009 credit union business loan losses (0.6%) were only one-fourth the similar losses at banks (2.4%), Cheney explains.

Cheney also refutes ICBA’s claims that the NCUA action related to the legacy assets of the conserved corporate credit unions amounts to a taxpayer bailout.

“This is simply not true,” Cheney writes. “While the bonds to be issued by NCUA have the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, credit unions—not taxpayers—will pay all of the costs.

“In contrast, according to an SNL Financial analysis of community bank recipients of TARP funds, over 621 banks—most under $10 billion in total assets—still owe the taxpayer $50 billion. More than 100 of these banks are behind on their payments to Treasury. Taxpayers will very likely be left on the hook for some of the bailout these community banks have received.”

“Deceptive rhetoric” is what Cheney calls ICBA’s claims that the corporate credit union situation should “cast doubts on the wisdom and the fairness of their tax-exempt status.”

“The value both credit union members and nonmembers receive because credit unions are tax exempt far outweighs the ‘cost’ of the exemption to the government,” Cheney writes, citing the $7.5 billion annual benefit credit unions provide the nation’s 93 million members.

“Further, the tax exemption helps to ensure consumers have choices beyond commercial banks in the financial marketplace.”

Resources

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive