Compliance

Minimizing the Impact Of Interchange Provisions

CUNA will continue to communicate CU concerns to the Fed.

August 19, 2010
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Credit union, league, and Credit Union National Association (CUNA) advocates have worked their hearts out to oppose the regulation of interchange fees and educate members of Congress on the impact of the financial reform bill’s interchange fee amendment. Developed by Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., the amendment directs the Federal Reserve Board to regulate electronic debit transaction fees for debit card issuers (financial institutions) with $10 billion or more in assets. A House and Senate conference agreed to the pending version of the reform bill, which already passed the House. At press time, the Senate vote appears likely.

CUNA is aware the Federal Reserve Board is already considering how it will implement the various provisions of the interchange amendment should the bill become law. So we’re discussing with key Fed staff credit union concerns and points for consideration regarding the impact of these provisions.

While small issuers won’t be covered by the Fed’s rule on interchange fees, they’ll still be affected by it. That’s because the Fed must write rules on interchange fees received or charged by large issuers that are “reasonable and proportional” to the cost incurred by such issuer with respect to a transaction. 

There’s great concern that under this language, the Fed will develop rules that result in much lower fees for larger issuers than credit unions currently receive and, thus, merchants may only want to accept the lower-fee debit cards. While the provisions clarify no merchant or network may discriminate between debit or credit cards within a payment network—which in essence is an “honor all cards” directive—it’s not clear how this will be enforced.

A factor that may be useful to credit unions is that the legislation was modified to generally exempt from the interchange provisions all local, state, and federal government-administered payment programs using debit cards or related payment devices. This may help ensure somewhat higher debit interchange fees for credit unions as well as for government-administered payment programs. 

Also, House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., sent a notice to House Democrats prior to the floor vote in that chamber stating that credit unions and other small issuers would be permitted to “continue to issue their debit cards without any market penalty.”

In writing its rules, the Fed must consider the similarity between debit transactions and checks that clear at par and focus on incremental costs to the large issuer (with assets of $10 billion or more) for authorization, clearance, or settlement of a particular debit. The Fed must consult with the other federal financial regulators, including the National Credit Union Administration.

The Fed may permit an adjustment to a debit interchange fee to allow for a large issuer’s costs in preventing debit transaction fraud. The Fed must write fraud-related standards for issuers, however. And issuers must comply with such standards for the Fed to allow adjustments to their interchange fees based on fraud costs.  

The Fed also has authority to collect “such information as may be necessary” from any issuer, which could include issuers that are exempt such as credit unions. While this could change, our conversations with Fed staff, however, didn’t indicate they plan to require small issuers to collect data.

But this raises another concern. Because even though any data collection on credit unions should be minimized to the greatest extent possible, the Fed, nonetheless, should take into account the impact of its interchange rate regulations on small issuers, such as credit unions. This is a major point we’ll be emphasizing in all our conversations with the Fed on interchange.

The Fed is directed to write final rules under the interchange provisions within nine months after enactment; the final rule takes effect within 12 months of enactment. CUNA has developed a credit union working group on interchange, and rest assured we’ll be drawing on its expertise as we continue to communicate concerns and solutions to the Fed.

MARY MITCHELL DUNN is senior vice president/deputy general counsel for the Credit Union National Association. Contact her at 202-508-6736.

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive