Volunteers

Governance Challenges Concern CUs Worldwide

Panelists cite a need for greater director responsibility and capability.

July 14, 2010
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +
Governance panel
Participants in a Tuesday morning panel focused on recent regulatory developments and challenges around the world. From left: Daniel Burns, moderator and WOCCU director from Canada; Andy Poprawa, president/CEO of the Deposit Insurance Corp. of Ontario, Canada; Gigi Hyland, NCUA board member; and Brandon Khoo, executive general manager for the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority.

By Michael Muckian and Steve Rodgers

The question of performance standards, capabilities, and remuneration for credit union directors worldwide dominated discussion among regulators and economists who served as panelists during twin general session discussions Tuesday at The 1 Credit Union Conference.

Situations differ for directors in Australia, Canada, Europe, and the U.S., but performance requirements are the same. That means higher levels of both responsibility and risk for volunteer and paid directors at credit unions worldwide.

Participants in a panel focused on recent regulatory development agreed that clearer definitions of board terms and responsibilities would make governance easier to regulate.

Gigi Hyland, National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) board member; Brandon Khoo, executive general manager for the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority; and Andy Poprawa, president/CEO of the Deposit Insurance Corp. of Ontario, Canada, offered insights into conditions in each of their own countries.

“Currently, there are no board term limits in the U.S.,” said Hyland. “That means some directors can serve 30, 40, 50, and even 60 years. While that’s not necessarily a bad thing, it could mean that directors don’t always have the fresh set of eyes needed to see changes in their credit union and the market.

“Boards of directors need to take a long, hard look in the mirror and ask themselves if they are really the best people to be representing their members.”

Daily News
View more conference coverage

A larger issue in many countries is the absence of board performance standards, which can pose significant risk for some credit unions, noted Poprawa, who also chairs WOCCU’s International Regulators Roundtable.

“Governance is an area of interest and also one of primary risk for global credit unions,” said Poprawa. “The Regulators Roundtable sees this and will be addressing the possible creation of global governance standards at its meeting.”

Poprawa said Canada recently passed legislation requiring term limits for directors, but the law gives credit unions significant leeway in determining those limits.

He said the Canadian regulator would be checking credit unions’ term limits to make sure they were reasonable and in members’ best interests.

“In Australia, we make it the credit unions’ responsibility to develop their own policies for the renewal of their boards of directors,” said Khoo.

Other regulatory panel discussion topics included the future of corporate credit unions and access to supplemental capital.

“Credit unions in the U.S. will have to determine whether or not they want to recapitalize the corporates and, if so, what will be the appropriate services for corporates to provide,” said Hyland. “NCUA is also studying the capital issue, and Congress probably won’t address it anytime soon.”

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive