FinCEN: Fraud & Terrorist Financing Reports Rise

June 28, 2010
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

Although the number of suspicious activity reports (SAR) filed by financial institutions declined from 1.29 million in 2008 to 1.28 million in 2009, reports of suspected fraud and terrorist financing grew.

That’s according to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s (FinCEN) its 14th edition of the SAR Activity Review By the Numbers, which covers suspicious activity reports (SARs) filed in 2009.

This is the first time since 1996 that the total number of SARs filed declined over a one-year period. SARs filed by depository institutions declined for the first time from 732,563 in 2008 to 720,309 in 2009.

SARs filed by depository institutions indicating terrorist financing increased 8% in 2009, the first such increase since 2004. Depository institution filers submitted 545 SARs indicating terrorist financing in 2009 and 4,914 terrorist financing SARs since July 2003 when this characterization was added.

Reports of suspected computer intrusion and counterfeit checks showed double-digit increases from the previous 12 months, increasing 52% percent and 12%, respectively.

Other changes from 2008 to 2009:

  • SARs identifying mortgage loan fraud rose 4%;
  • Suspected incidents of credit card fraud grew 5%;
  • SARs filed by securities and futures firms indicating check fraud increased 15%;
  • SARs indicating wire fraud jumped 39%;
  • SARs identifying mail fraud grew 23%;
  • SARs indicating consumer loan fraud fell 31%; and
  • SARs citing check kiting dropped 23%

On the flip side, the number of reports indicating consumer loan fraud fell 31% Fraud reports There were some areas where the reported incidence of suspected fraud fell in 2009.

Post a comment to this story


What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive