Compliance

Collective Problems; Cooperative Solutions

June 21, 2010
/ PRINT / ShareShare / Text Size +

In March, CUNA President/CEO Dan Mica sent to the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) one of the most significant comment letters CUNA has ever developed on one of the most critical issues facing the credit union system today—the regulation of corporate credit unions.

The proposal seeks to minimize risks to natural-person credit unions, the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund, and to corporates in the future by requiring much higher capital standards, limiting investment activities, and imposing additional asset/liability management requirements, as well as corporate governance provisions.

CUNA’s Corporate Credit Union Task Force developed the letter and brought a range of viewpoints into their deliberations, including the concerns of large and small credit unions.

CUNA’s letter was based on several key concerns. First, protecting the interests of all natural-person credit unions is primary and should be the focal point of the final rule. This includes helping to ensure natural-person credit unions will be able to continue receiving the services—settlement, payments, investment options, and liquidity resources—they need to serve their members. Also, corporate credit unions should be able to provide or facilitate credit unions’ access to those services now and into the future.

But while recognizing it’s preferable for corporate credit unions to continue providing such services if possible, the reality is that natural-person credit unions are now in the process of paying for about $9.5 billion in losses resulting from corporate investments in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.

To avoid such losses in the future, the letter recommends a new operating model for corporate credit unions that would still meet the need for key services, including investment management, but not on the corporates’ balance sheets.

The basic regulatory framework NCUA has proposed, while needing a number of changes, will also help contain future corporate credit union losses. Among the changes CUNA is seeking is for NCUA to help corporates make the transition from the current model to a new approach. If corporates have a reasonable regulatory regime and can modify their operations to manage risks sufficiently, then they should be allowed to operate without undue interference.

The letter also urges the agency to develop a solution for corporates’ devalued “legacy assets” that would protect future capital in corporates from having to cover future losses related to devalued assets.

CUNA formed a Working Group on Next Steps to address how these recommendations can be implemented with the goal of continuing services from within the credit union system.

Avoiding future risks, addressing legacy assets, and, above all, making sure natural-person credit unions have access to services—these are collective problems that call for cooperative solutions.

MARY MITCHELL DUNN is senior vice president/deputy general counsel for the Credit Union National Association. Contact her at 202-508-6736 or at mdunn@cuna.com.

CUNA’s Corporate CU Task Force

  • Terry West, VyStar CU, Jacksonville, Fla. (chairman)
  • Bob Allen, Teachers FCU, Farmingville, N.Y.
  • Tom Dorety, Suncoast Schools FCU, Tampa, Fla.
  • Tom Gaines, Tennessee CU League
  • Rich Helber, Tropical Financial CU, Pembroke Pines, Fla.
  • Harriet May, GECU, El Paso, Texas
  • Kris Mecham, Deseret First CU, Salt Lake City
  • Mike Mercer, Georgia CU Affiliates
  • Frank Michael, Allied CU, Stockton, Calif.
  • Jane Watkins, Virginia CU, Richmond

 

Post a comment to this story

heroes

What's Popular

Popular Stories

Recent Discussion

Great article! Unfortunately, most employees don’t feel valued or appreciated by their supervisors or employers. In fact, research has shown that the predominant reason team members quit their jobs is because they don’t feel valued. This is in spite of the fact that employee recognition programs have proliferated in the workplace – over 90% of all organizations in the U.S. has some form of employee recognition activities in place. But most employee recognition programs are viewed with skepticism and cynicism – because they aren’t viewed as being genuine in their communication of appreciation. Getting the “employee of the month” award, receiving a certificate of recognition, or a “Way to go, team!” email just don’t get the job done. How do you communicate authentic appreciation? We have found people have different ways that they want to be shown appreciation, and if you don’t communicate in the language of appreciation important to them, you essentially “miss the mark”. Additionally, employees need to receive recognition more than once a year at their performance review. Otherwise, they view the praise as “going through the motions”. A third component of authentic appreciation is that the communication has to be about them personally – not the department, not their group, but something they did. Finally, they have to believe that you mean what you say. How you treat them has to match the words you use. If you are not sure how your team members want to be shown appreciation, the Motivating By Appreciation Inventory (www.appreciationatwork.com/assess) will identify the language of appreciation and specific actions preferred by each employee. You then can create a group profile for your team, so everyone knows how to encourage one another. Remember, employees want to know that they are valued for what they contribute to the success of the organization. And communicating authentic appreciation in the ways they desire it can make the difference between keeping your quality team members or having a negative work environment that everyone wants to leave. Paul White, Ph.D., is the co-author of The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace with Dr. Gary Chapman.

Your Say: Who should be Credit Union Magazine's 2014 CU Hero of the Year?

View Results Poll Archive